From 11 April to 18 May 2023, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) asked for comments and information on Livingston ‘Livi’ Skatepark to help inform our assessment of the skatepark for listing.
A building may become listed if it is of special architectural and historic interest. Our selection guidance for designation and the policies we work to are published in the Designations Policy and Selection Guidance document.
This is the first time we have been asked to list a skatepark, and we were keen to hear from people who know and use Livi Skatepark, and/or have a view on its design, history and significance.
We are delighted to have received 557 responses to our online survey.
We will now work to analyse these responses, together with the feedback we received when we visited the skatepark in April.
Our next steps will be to compile a report on our findings, which we will publish online. If we consider that the skatepark meets the criteria for listing, we will consult with West Lothian Council as the owners and local authority before making a decision.
Skateboard Scotland, the official governing body for skateboarding, helped to shape this survey. Where we have consent from participants, we will forward responses to them for their interest.
From 20 April to 11 May 2023, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate the remnant of the Gulliver Sculpture in Edinburgh at category C.
The left foot of the Gulliver Sculpture is among the last remains of an enormous concrete human figure play sculpture, conceived and completed between 1976 and 1978 for the Craigmillar Festival Society. Gulliver was largely demolished in 2011. It is an important example of community-led public art in Scotland and a rare surviving marker of the work of the influential grass-roots regeneration initiative known as the Craigmillar Festival Society (1962-2002).
We received no responses to the Citizen Space consultation.
Following direct consultation to interested parties, we received comments from The Twentieth Century Society and Docomomo Scotland. Both were in favour of listing.
The Twentieth Century Society noted their previous application to list, and made the following points:
Docomomo Scotland commented that the remnant of the sculpture was ‘A rare reminder of the Craigmillar Festival Society and its work.’
The local authority had no substantive comments. They noted no issues regarding the proposed listing from a planning perspective, and no relevant development proposals affecting the site.
We have now listed the remnant of the sculpture at category C. The listed building records are available on our Heritage Portal, where the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
From 9 February to 2 March 2023, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate Stobs Camp and associated sites as scheduled monuments.
The sites are nationally important monuments that were found to meet our criteria for designation. Stobs Camp is a site that makes a significant contribution to our understanding or appreciation of the military heritage of Scotland, in particular the history of early 20th century military training and First World War internment and imprisonment.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal: Stobs Camp - Portal.
We received 87 responses which contributed to our knowledge of the monument and also provided insight into how the Camp and associated sites are valued.
An overwhelming majority of the responses were in favour of designating Stobs Camp as a scheduled monument. The following table is a brief summary of the survey results, with focus on the key three questions related to our assessment of the site using the selection guidance for scheduled monuments to decide whether the sites were of national importance.
|
To what extent do you feel the report is an accurate account of the intrinsic characteristics of the monument? |
|
|
To what extent do you feel the report is an accurate account of the contextual characteristics of the monument? |
|
|
To what extent do you feel the report is an accurate account of the associative characteristics of the monument? |
|
We received additional comments, the overwhelming majority were supportive of the proposal and recognising the importance of the Camp. The Report on Handling on our Heritage Portal (linked above) provides the responses where a query was raised, along with our answers and information. Some comments from respondents did not raise a query but offered their insight and opinion. Some of these comments include:
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now scheduled Stobs Camp and associated sites as nationally important monuments.
Download the Report of Handling from our Heritage Portal: Stobs Camp - Designation.
Between 28 Nov 2022 and 20 Feb 2023, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on a draft of a new strategy for Scotland’s historic environment.
Scotland’s first historic environment strategy, Our Place in Time (OPiT) was published in 2014. Recognising so much has change since its release, in February 2022, the Minister for Culture, Europe and International Development, commissioned HES to conduct a review and refresh of OPiT.
The new strategy was to prioritise activity that supports economic recovery and renewal, focuses on creating a more resilient and sustainable historic environment, and helps to communicate the contribution that the historic environment makes to the makes to the nation’s economy, wellbeing, and net zero ambitions.
The draft we consulted on was the product of months of engagement with people and organisations across Scotland. In total, 18 workshops and events were delivered between June-September 2022, attended by 191 organisations and 649 participants.
Through the public consultation we wanted your help to test and improve the draft strategy, using the consultation period as an opportunity to listen to your views. We have used your feedback, and your knowledge and insight of Scotland’s historic environment, to help shape the final version.
In addition to the consultation being hosted online, HES and Built Environment Forum Scotland (BEFS) organised 8 events in January-February 2023. These were attended by 147 participants who provided a wealth of feedback. We also worked with other partners to engage young people, ethnic minorities, and people with disabilities, via bespoke surveys and workshops. The consultation was also promoted via social media and articles in national and local press.
We had 137 written responses to the public consultation, received either via our online portal Citizen Space or via emailed responses. An external company was commissioned to undertake consultation analysis and provide a detailed report on findings. Their analysis report has been published along with the other assessments we needed to carry out, Our Past, Our Future – Consultation Reports.
Overall, there was majority support for the mission, principles, and priorities with over two thirds of respondents signalling support, rising to more than three-quarters supporting particular principles and priorities.
Some expressed a preference for the mission statement to focus on protecting, safeguarding, and valuing the historic environment. A minority of respondents thought the mission statement was too vague or that its meaning was unclear; for example, there were some objections to the phrase ‘harness the power’ or the use of ‘our’ or ‘our society’.
Of the six principles set out, all were supported by around two in three or more respondents. The most supported was ‘we must care for, and protect, our heritage assets’ (90% of respondents); the least supported was ‘we must be prepared to make difficult decisions’ (68%).
Of the three priorities outlined, 69% or more respondents supported all three. The most supported priority was ‘Empowering vibrant, resilient, and inclusive communities and places’, by 80% of respondents.
The draft KPIs and Actions received the most suggestions for change and addition and required the most revision.
While respondents were generally positive about the draft strategy, their responses identified a few areas where some improvements could be made in the final draft:
There was wide identification of a need to revisit aspects of language and consistency of application, including the use of ‘you, us, we, our’ and the split between ‘nationally’ and ‘locally’.
Several respondents expressed a wish to make better connection to some elements of the first OPiT, particularly in relation to themes around ‘care and protect’
Suggestions by some that the built environment was over-represented in the draft and calls for more reference to be made to various sub-sectors or elements of historic environment e.g., archaeology, undesignated assets, landscapes
Calls to better foreground skills and the sector workforce, including volunteers
Concerns expressed by some in terms of deliverability, funding, and resourcing, especially the potential ask of Local Government and smaller local organisations in the context of the legacy impacts of COVID, the cost of living crisis, and squeeze on public finances
Identification of a need to consider how to tackle perception of this strategy being a Scottish Government and/or Historic Environment Scotland (HES) strategy rather than a national one for the sector. Some stakeholders noting also that the sector strategy has lacked visibility and should have an improved web presence that is clearly distinct from HES’s branding.
Title
We have given the new strategy a new name, Our Past, Our Future: The Strategy for Scotland’s Historic Environment, to distinguish it from its predecessor.
General
We have added ‘sustain and enhance’ to the mission statement and removed ‘harness the power’, this is to better reflect the ‘care and protect’ values found in OPiT. We have changed the wording around benefit recipients from ‘our society’ to ‘people and communities’ as this was felt to resonate with people on a more personal level. We have included reference to these benefits being felt now and into the future – this aligns with the sentiment of the original OPiT that some respondents wanted to maintain. We also have also increased the emphasis on sustainable behaviours.
About this strategy
We expanded this section to include more reference to the day-to-day work of the sector, and to make it clear that activities fundamental to understanding, caring for and promoting the sector will not – and should not – stop over the life of the strategy.
We reworked elements of this section to better define who the ‘we’ the strategy refers to is, and what this means for how people use the document.
Scotland’s historic environment
We included a stronger articulation of what the historic environment is, and what the definition covers. The core definition has not changed from the previous strategy. This section also sketches some of the ways in which people value the historic environment and re-emphasises that the strategy does not list every single element of it, or every way that people relate to or work with it.
Principles
We have made changes to several of the principles, based on feedback:
We have reworded the ‘we must care for our heritage assets’ principle to state that ‘we must protect and promote our historic environment’.
We have combined two principles that both touched on decision-making and reworded the strapline away from ‘difficult decisions’ to ‘good decisions’.
We have added a new principle on workforce to foreground skills and equalities more overtly as cross-cutting themes.
We have made minor additions to the principle on people, to include homeowners as a core stakeholder group, and to foreground the need to eliminate discrimination in our work.
Our Priorities
We have changed ‘enabling the transition to net zero’ to ‘delivering the transition to net zero’, to emphasise the urgency of action under this priority.
We have revised the ‘responsibility for delivery’ sub-section to reflect updates to how the actions are pitched, and to reinforce points made elsewhere that the strategy should be seen as for everyone, with everyone having a role to play.
KPIs have become outcomes to better reflect the multiple ways that the historic environment contributes to other policy areas and priorities. Only one – children and young people – has substantively altered in response to feedback to make this broader, and now talks about diversity and inclusion more widely.
We have moved away from the ‘nationally we will, locally you can’ formulation as some feedback suggested this was divisive, as well as missing the regional level. We have adapted the actions so that they now sit under each priority theme, rather than under each outcome within the priority. The actions have been slimmed down and left relatively high-level.
Measuring Success
This section has been extensively revised, and sources for evidencing success have been identified under each priority. Learning from our experience of reporting on OPiT, and listening to feedback from respondents, we have proposed that a performance framework that measures success using mix of national statistics, sector reporting through strategy delivery groups, and use of diverse range of case studies. We will make reporting more dynamic, highlighting progress and sharing new data as it becomes available.
Summary
After making a number of changes based on consultation feedback, Scotland’s new historic environment strategy, Our Past, Our Future is to be launched in Summer 2023.
We are very grateful for the time invested by respondents and workshop contributors in sharing their ideas, views and feedback.
From 22 September 2022 to 30 November 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate the former munition works at Eastriggs as a scheduled monument and listed building.
Our assessment of the site’s cultural significance concluded that it meets the criteria for designation and as such is a nationally important monument. The former munition works at Eastriggs makes a significant contribution to our understanding or appreciation of the military heritage of Scotland, in particular as a nationally significant munitions factory that produced the propellent cordite during the First World War. Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal.
We received 100 responses to the consultation: one from the Local Authority, one from the owner’s agents, 94 from private individuals via our Citizen Space survey, and 4 from private individuals via our consultation mailbox.
You can see what people said by downloading the summary report available on these pages.
The comments we received have contributed to our knowledge of the monument and also provided insight into how the factory is valued. The significant majority of the responses recognised the importance of the factory and its remains. The significant majority were in favour of designating the former munition works at Eastriggs as a scheduled monument.
In summary, 98% of respondents to the Citizen Space survey suggested that the Eastriggs site and the surviving elements of the factory are an important part of our heritage, with 96% either agreeing/strongly agreeing that it should be given heritage recognition and protection and 96% agreement with our proposals to designate the site, including the balance of listing and scheduling in our proposal. A further breakdown of the results follows:
Respondent location and identity:
Cultural significance:
Heritage protection and recognition:
The significant majority (96%) agree that the combination of Scheduling and Listing will recognise the site’s cultural significance. A minority (4%) do not think this.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have made a change to the listed building proposal before taking the decision to designate elements of the former munition works at Eastriggs as a listed building and as a scheduled monument.
The Report on Handling on our Heritage Portal sets out our decision.
We invited feedback on a report we commissioned from Lichfields UK: Battlefields Planning Best Practice. The Lichfields Report is available on the HES website.
We received 29 responses, covering the conclusion of the report and its recommendations. Thank you to everyone who responded.
You can see what people said by downloading the summary report (see below).
We are now analysing the views we have received.
Your feedback will help to inform our next steps, including any actions we propose to take in relation to the role of Historic Environment Scotland, or changes we recommend to others with responsibilities in the planning system.
From 27 September to 18 October 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate buildings at Ardbeg Distillery at category A and C.
Ardbeg Distillery was registered as a legal commercial distillery in 1815 but was known to be in production from the late 18th century – early historical whisky records indicate spirit was being illicitly produced at Ardbeg from 1798. Some of the buildings at the distillery date from 1815 with later 19th century additions and expansion.
Ardbeg Distillery is a very early surviving example of a whisky distillery in Scotland with its core buildings amongst the five oldest surviving examples in the country. The level of survival of its original distillery buildings is rare within the building type. This site is remarkable because it has been in almost continuous use since the early 19th century.
We received no responses to the Citizens Space consultation.
The proposer and local authority had no substantive comments. The owner raised a query regarding potential future Listed Building Consent and the planning process once Listed. An online meeting was held between HES, the owner and the local authority and all parties were content with no further issues raised.
We have now listed the buildings at category A and C. The listed building records are available on our Heritage Portal (LB52611 and LB52613), where the final Report of Handling (LB52611 and LB52613) is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
From 9 to 30 August 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate land at St Michael’s Knowe, Coldingham, Scottish Borders and surrounding area as a scheduled monument.
We were interested to find out what information you had about the site and also to gather views about some or all of the site being designated as a scheduled monument.
We received nine responses, which contributed to our knowledge of the area and also provided insight into how the site is valued.
Most of the responses were in favour of designating the land at St Michael's Knowe as a scheduled monument. Our questions focussed on your relationship to the site, any knowledge you may have that was useful and which areas you felt should be scheduled. Eight out of the nine responded that they felt all the areas outlined in the consultation should be scheduled.
We received additional comments, most supportive of the proposal and recognising the importance of the site. Some comments from respondents include:
"I'm delighted that the area around Coldingham Priory and St Michael's Knowe is under consideration for listing as a scheduled monument."
"The area is of major historical significance and requires further archaeological investigation. Any developments prior to this would be extremely detrimental."
We had a single negative comment:
"Will it make any difference to the usual train of nonsense and waste as every other designated site other than the ones HES charge to get in to?"
We note the negative comment above. We schedule to recognise our most significant sites and monuments. This provides for the protection and preservation of the cultural significance of scheduled monuments through a series of consents, compliance, enforcement and monitoring procedures managed by us. Being a scheduled monument does not confer any right of public access.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we will now take forward a designation assessment. We will use the information supplied to inform our designation assessment for St Michael's Knowe and the surrounding area. Once this assessment has been completed, we will consult on our proposed decision.
From 22 June to 13 July 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate the harbour in Brora as a category C listed building.
Brora Harbour was built in 1813-14 to import and export raw materials and finished products relating to the local coal mining, salt-panning, fishing and brickwork industries in Brora.
We received no responses to consultation.
We have now listed Brora Harbour as a category C listed building. The listed building record is available on our Heritage Portal, where the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
From 8 June to 29 July 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate the former Chivas Brothers Headquarters Building in Paisley as a category C listed building.
The building was constructed in 1962-64 as the headquarters of the Chivas Brothers company, one of the world’s leading producers of high-quality blended Scotch whisky.
It was designed to look like an authentic old Scottish country house, and this reflected the brand image that the company marketed to the world. The historicist style and high-quality neo-classical detailing is rare for a building of this date, and the building has remained largely unchanged since it was constructed.
We received 32 responses to the consultation, 28 of which were in favour of the listing. The vast majority of comments stated that they would like to see the building retained and incorporated into the design for the new Paisley Grammar School.
The four objections, which included one from Renfrewshire Council, were mainly concerned that the additional costs and consents that listing may incur, could jeopardise its future reuse. The Council queried the special interest of the building, with the exception of the main façade. There were also some concerns about maintenance costs, safety issues and the potential impact on the completion of the new school. One response noted they were against listing the building, as it would celebrate a company that abandoned the town.
We considered the responses carefully and we have discussed the proposed designation further with Renfrewshire Council. After further consideration of the special interest of the building, we have excluded the interior from the listing.
We have now listed the former Chivas Brothers Headquarters Building in Paisley as a category C listed building, excluding the interior. The listed building record is available on our Heritage Portal, where the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
From 7 June to 28 June 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate the Palacerigg Visitor Centre as a category B listed building.
The Visitor Centre at the Palacerigg Country Park, Cumbernauld contains a mural in the foyer by Alasdair Gray (1934–2019). Alasdair Gray painted the mural in 1974 having been commissioned by naturalist and Director of the Country Park, David Stephen. The theme of the mural is natural and human ecology, and it shows Scottish wildlife in an idealised countryside scene.
Glasgow-born artist and writer Alasdair Gray is a cultural figure of national importance. Best known for his 1981 novel Lanark, he studied design and mural painting at Glasgow School of Art and was commissioned to paint murals in and around Glasgow from the 1950s until the 2010s. The mural at Palacerigg Visitor Centre is amongst the earlier surviving examples of his visual art.
We received 40 responses to the consultation, all of which were in favour of the listing.
The majority of responses commented on Gray’s significance as an artist, author and poet and wished to see the mural protected. Many responses noted that other Gray murals had been lost and that this highlighted the increasing rarity and vulnerability of Gray’s surviving murals. Some responses emphasised the significance of the mural work as reflection of the pioneering work of naturalist, Palacerigg Country Park Warden and commissioner of the work, David Stephen.
We received a number of responses which included personal reflections of visits to Palacerigg Country Park where the mural in the Visitor Centre was admired and appreciated. We also received some responses from individuals who knew or had met Alasdair Gray and recalled aspects of his personality and working style.
One response raised concerns about the application of the listing to the entire Palacerigg Visitor Centre building and how this might impact future works to the building.
We considered the responses carefully and we have discussed the proposed designation further with North Lanarkshire Council. We clarified that the listing of the wider Palacerigg Visitor Centre building is intended to protect the mural which is embedded in the fabric of the building.
We have now listed the Palacerigg Visitor Centre in Cumbernauld as a category B listed building. The listed building record is available on our Heritage Portal, where the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
From 12 May to 12 June 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) asked people about the potential special architectural or historic interest of the 1960s Cumbernauld Town Centre.
Built 1963-72, the building in the town centre was designed as a ‘megastructure’ – a single structure with a range of different uses – and included shops, offices, civic buildings, a bus station, hotel and apartments. At the time of its construction, it won recognition as an outstanding example of town centre planning and modern innovation.
In more recent years, the building has divided opinion and has been altered extensively. Now there is a proposal to regenerate the site currently occupied by the megastructure to provide a multi-purpose town hub and other community and commercial developments.
We launched a public consultation because we were asked by a member of the public to consider designating the 1960s Cumbernauld Town Centre as a listed building. We did this to help to inform our listing assessment.
Following the initial consultation period, we also considered detailed responses from the owners of the Town Centre and North Lanarkshire Council who are currently planning to acquire and regenerate the site.
We were delighted to have over 2,000 responses to our consultation. We were very pleased to hear from local residents with over three quarters of respondents noting they were from Cumbernauld. We also heard from key stakeholders who are responsible for the management and future development of the Town Centre.
The responses included views about the special architectural and historic interest of the Town Centre and you also told us about how you valued the site and whether you think it should be recognised and protected in the future. You also told us about your aspirations for the redevelopment of the town centre.
While many of the responses we received provided detailed evidence and arguments for and against designation, only a small number engaged directly with the criteria of special architectural or historic interest, the principal factors for listing. The responses were largely focused on condition and future use as well as the experience of the place both past and present, which for some was negative and others was positive. Over three quarters of the responses to our consultation were against listing.
The level of engagement was very positive reflecting the interest in the discussion about listing but also in suggestions made about how to recognise the history of the place as part of any proposals for change.
We have published a summary report on the consultation which was compiled for us by an independent company. This report shows a range of opinions on the proposal both for and against listing. It also includes a full transcript of all the responses submitted to us where the respondents agreed to publication.
The response from the majority owner note how much the Town Centre has changed since it was first constructed. In their response, North Lanarkshire Council provided information on the nature and progress of their regeneration proposals. We have published these reports at the links below.
We have considered the case for listing and have found Phases One and Two of the Town Centre meet the criteria of special architectural or historic interest. This is because the building is an early exemplar of its building type, known internationally as an icon of post-war megastructural design theory. We note that the structure and the plan form of the original phases are largely intact despite later additions and alterations.
But while we have found the building to be of special interest in listing terms, we have also decided not to proceed with listing at this time. This is because of our policy which takes into account the individual circumstances of development proposals affecting the site.
We have published an account of our decision-making in our Report of Handling. This report includes a detailed assessment against the selection guidance for listing.
From 10 May to 31 May 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate the Library and Arbuthnot Museum in Peterhead as a category C listed building.
The library and museum building is constructed in pink Peterhead granite and is architecturally well-detailed. Built between 1891 and 1893 and designed in the ‘Free Renaissance’ style, it includes oriel windows, curvilinear gables and a prominent corner tower with a domed and finialled roof. It is one of the earliest Carnegie public libraries in Scotland (and the world) and its plan form is indicative of early public library design. Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal.
We received one response to consultation which confirmed the building is not subject to any active planning applications. No objections were raised to the proposed listing of the building.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now listed the Library and Arbuthnot Museum as a category C listed building. The listed building record is available on our Heritage Portal, where the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
From 7 to 28 April 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate Carsethorn pier as a scheduled monument.
The site is a nationally important monument that was found to meet our criteria for designation: Criteria. Carsethorn Pier is an archaeological feature that makes a significant contribution to our understanding and appreciation of the maritime heritage of southwest Scotland, and its contribution to the history of 19th century emigration.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal: Carsethorn Pier - Portal.
We received 13 responses which contributed to our knowledge of the monument and also provided insight into how the pier is valued.
All of the responses were in favour of designating Carsethorn Pier as a scheduled monument. Each question related to our assessment of the monument in intrinsic, contextual and associative aspects were scored as "strongly agree" by 10 responses and "agree" by the remaining 3 responses.
We received additional comments, all supportive of the proposal and recognising the importance of the pier. Some comments from respondents include:
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now scheduled Carsethorn Pier as a nationally important monument.
Download the Report of Handling from our Heritage Portal: Carsethorn Pier - Designation.
Dh’fhaighnich sinne
Eadar 16 A’ Mhàirt agus 6 An Giblean 2022 bha Àrainneachd Eachdraidheil Alba (HES) a’ sireadh bheachdan air a’ mholadh againn ìre clàraidh an togalaich seo atharrachadh bho B gu A agus eadar-theangachadh Gàidhlig a chur ris an t-seòladh clàraidh aige.
Air a togail ann an 1901-04, ’s e eaglais paraiste fhollaiseach agus mòr-mhaisichte, air a dealbh le Uilleam Tennant agus Fred V Burke, a tha ann an Eaglais Ghàidhlig Chaluim Cille. Chaidh a togail airson coimhearsnachd Ghàidhlig Ghlaschu a fhrithealadh. Tha ùidh shònraichte innte airson a beairteas de mhion-obair cloiche snaighte, taobh a-staigh a tha an ìre mhath slàn, a follaiseachd air aon de phrìomh shràidean Ghlaschu, agus airson a h-ùidh mar fhòcas airson adhradh anns a’ Ghàidhlig.
Gheibhear tuilleadh fiosrachaidh air ar Heritage Portal.
Thuirt sibhse
Fhuair sinn aon fhreagairt dhan cho-chomhairleachadh nach do thog gearan a thaobh an eaglais a chlàradh. Bha am freagairt aig Urrasairean Coitcheann Eaglais na h-Alba, mar shealbhadairean an togalaich, a’ toirt fainear gu robhas a’ dol a reic an togalaich agus nach robh co-dhùnadh ann fhathast a thaobh ciamar a bhiodh seirbheisean Gàidhlig air an tairgsinn ann an Glaschu no am biodh iad co-cheangailte ri aon thogalach. Chuir na h-Urrasairean cuideachd thugainn tomhais de cheartachaidhean a thaobh teacsa na h-aithisg.
Rinn Sinne
An dèidh meòrachadh air na beachdan a fhuair sinn tron cho-chomhairleachadh, tha sinn a-nise air an ìre clàraidh aig Eaglais Ghàidhlig Chaluim Cille / St Columba Gaelic Church atharrachadh gu Ìre A. Tha sinn cuideachd air seòladh a’ chlàraidh atharrachadh gu ainm Gàidhlig na h-Eaglaise a bhith na phàirt dheth agus cheartaich sinn dà mhearachd fhìrinneach anns an Aithisg Làimhseachaidh.
Tha clàr nan togalaichean clàraichte ri fhaighinn air ar Heritage Portal agus tha an Aithisg Làimhseachaidh dheireannaich cuideachd ri fhaighinn.
Tha ar n-àrainneachd eachdraidheil daonnan ag atharrachadh. Chan eil clàradh a’ cur bacadh air atharrachadh ach tha e a’ leigeil le caractar sònraichte structair a bhith air a ghabhail a-steach nuair a tha atharraichean san amharc.
Chan eil clàradh a’ ciallachadh gu feum Eaglais Ghàidhlig Chaluim Cille / St Columba Gaelic Church fuireach mar a tha i gu bràth no fiùs gu feum i a bhith na h-eaglais gu bràth – faodaidh mòran thogalaichean a bhith air an ath-chleachdadh airson feumannan eadar-dhealaichte.
Gheibh sibh an tuilleadh a-mach mu chlàradh san leabhran againn Scotland’s Listed Buildings no air an làraich-lìn againn:
Tha mion fhiosrachadh a bharrachd mu phròiseasan Listed Building Consent (LBC) and Conservation Area Consent (CAC) air an làraich-lìn againn a bharrachd air fiosrachadh mu chuir a-steach air a shon.
Tha stiùireadh a bharrachd anns an t-sreath fhoillseachaidhean againn Managing Change .
From 16 March to 6 April 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to change the category of listing of this building from B to A and to add a Gaelic translation to its listing address.
Built in 1901-04, Eaglais Ghàidhlig Chaluim Cille / St Columba Gaelic Church is an ornate and prominent parish church designed by William Tennant and Fred V Burke to cater for the Gaelic-speaking community in Glasgow. It is of special interest for listing for its wealth of carved stonework detailing, its largely complete interior, its prominence on one of Glasgow’s main streets, and for its cultural and historic interest as a focal point for worship in the Gaelic language.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal.
We received one response to consultation which raised no objections to the listing of the church. The response from the General Trustees of the Church of Scotland, as owners of the building, noted that the building was to be marketed for sale and that the issue of how Gaelic services will be provided within Glasgow, and whether this will be linked to a specific building, has not yet been determined. The General Trustees also provided some corrections to the text of the report.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now changed the category of listing of Eaglais Ghàidhlig Chaluim Cille / St Columba Gaelic Church to category A. We have also changed the listing address to include the Gaelic name of the building, and corrected two factual errors within the Report of Handling.
The listed building record is available on our Heritage Portal and the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
Listing does not mean that Eaglais Ghàidhlig Chaluim Cille / St Columba Gaelic Church should stay as it is forever, or even that it must always remain a church - many buildings can be repurposed for different uses.
You can find out more about listing in our booklet, Scotland’s Listed Buildings or find out more on our website:
Our website also has more detail about the Listed Building Consent (LBC) and Conservation Area Consent (CAC) processes, as well as information on how to apply. There is additional guidance in our Managing Change series of publications.
From 15 March to 5 April 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate Duntocher Trinity Parish Church as a category B listed building.
This building is a relatively early and architecturally distinctive example of a post-war church, designed and constructed soon after the war to replace the previous church on the site that was destroyed during the Clydebank Blitz of 1941. Duntocher Trinity Parish Church is traditional in plan form, but its design indicates strong Continental influences, such as its use of parabolic arches and its high-quality brick and concrete construction.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal
We received three responses to consultation which raised no objections to the listing of the church. The response from West Dunbartonshire Council planning authority provided detailed information about the setting of the church and its relative special interest.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now listed Duntocher Trinity Parish Church at category B. We have made some changes as a result of the comments received. Our assessment and the listed building record have been amended to highlight the special interest of the setting of the church.
The listed building record is available on our Heritage Portal and the final Report of Handling is also available.
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
Listing does not mean that Duntocher Trinity Parish Church should stay as it is forever, or even that it must always remain a church - many buildings can be repurposed for different uses.
You can find out more about listing in our booklet, Scotland’s Listed Buildings or find out more on our website:
How does the listing process work?
What does listing mean for owners?
Our website also has more detail about the Listed Building Consent (LBC) and Conservation Area Consent (CAC) processes, as well as information on how to apply. There is additional guidance in our Managing Change series of publications.
From 7 March to 28 March 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to list the Former St Rollox Locomotive Works in Springburn at category B.
First built in 1854-56 then remodelled and enlarged in the 1880s, St Rollox Works is a rare surviving example of a major centre for locomotive manufacture and repair. Consisting of 12 adjoining workshops, the building retains much of its historic character and fabric, including 19th century structural ironwork and internal fixtures. It is now the only building of this type to survive in Springburn, Glasgow - formerly one of the world's main centres of locomotive construction.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal.
We received a total of 17 responses to consultation.
Sixteen responses were in favour of designating St Rollox as a listed building.
The comments contributed to our knowledge of the building and our understanding of how St Rollox is valued.
The former locomotive works was described as an important piece of history representing a golden age of British engineering, part of Scotland’s industrial and railway heritage, and an important part of the history of Glasgow. They were noted as providing a window into the lives of thousands of workers. Comments highlighted the overwhelming external and internal architecture of the rail sheds and provided information on the use of the site during the Second World War. A number of respondents expressed hope that an appropriate use for the site could be found so that its heritage could be preserved.
One comment queried the potential for change to the building for alternative use, including the potential acceptability of sub-dividing the space, covering some of the tracks and pits and demolishing two of the smaller sheds.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now listed the Former St Rollox Locomotive Works at category B.
Listed building record for Former St Rollox Locomotive Works (LB52603)
Our Report of Handling provides more detail on the comments received. This can be downloaded from our Heritage Portal
We have made some additional changes as a result of the comments received – our assessment and the listed building record have been amended to note the role of the locomotive works for military manufacture during the Second World War.
In response to the comments about future use, we provided general comments on the principles of adapting the internal space and replacing roof materials and indicated that we would be happy to engage in more detailed discussions about adaptive reuse once development proposals are more advanced.
The storage sheds flagged at consultation were once used for copper and iron and form part of and inform our understanding of the former locomotive works and therefore should be included within the listing.
More Information
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
Listing does not mean that the Former St Rollox Locomotive Works should stay as it is forever - many buildings can be repurposed for different uses.
You can find out more about listing in our booklet, Scotland’s Listed Buildings or find out more on our website:
Our website also has more detail about the Listed Building Consent (LBC) and Conservation Area Consent (CAC) processes, as well as information on how to apply. There is additional guidance in our Managing Change series of publications.
From 14 December to 25 January 2022, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on our proposal to designate Dundee Repertory Theatre as a category A listed building.
The building is an exceptional example of a late-20th century theatre design that was found to meet our criteria for designation. Despite being restricted by a very tight budget and a small site, the building is distinguished for its design quality and complements the historic setting of Tay Square. It is also one of only three major examples of new theatres that were purpose-built in Scotland during the theatre building boom of the 1950s-80s.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal.
We received 12 responses which contributed to our knowledge of the building and also provided insight into how the theatre is valued.
All of the responses were in favour of designating Dundee Rep as a listed building.
Dundee Rep was described as a unique and cleverly designed building that is striking, both inside and out. Overall people thought it was very successful in its function as a theatre, particularly due to its well organised layout within the constrained site. They felt that it positively contributes to the character of Tay Square and is an important cultural hub that is at the heart of the city’s arts quarter.
There was one concern that listing may prevent improvements being made to the building in terms of accessibility. One response highlighted that its continued use as a repertory theatre, or ‘rep’, is very rare within the context of Scotland and the wider UK, as many former ‘reps’ now operate as touring houses. The local authority also provided additional information about the external lighting scheme and sculptural banner pole in Tay Square.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have now listed Dundee Repertory Theatre at category A.
Listed building record for Dundee Repertory Theatre
Download the Report of Handling from our Heritage Portal
We have made some changes as a result of the comments received – our assessment and the listed building record have been amended to highlight the rarity of Dundee Rep as a repertory theatre.
More Information
Our historic environment is always changing. Listing does not prevent change, but it does allow for a structure’s special character to be taken into account when changes are proposed.
Listing does not mean that the Dundee Rep should stay as it is forever, or even that it must always remain a theatre - many buildings can be repurposed for different uses.
You can find out more about listing in our booklet, Scotland’s Listed Buildings or find out more on our website:
Our website also has more detail about the Listed Building Consent (LBC) and Conservation Area Consent (CAC) processes, as well as information on how to apply. There is additional guidance in our Managing Change series of publications.
From 10 November to 22 December 2021, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) sought views on revisions to the inventory battlefield record for the Battle of Pinkie (September 1547).
The Battle of Pinkie was fought across the area of coastal plain now mainly agricultural land and the settlements of Musselburgh, Wallyford, Carberry and Whitecraig in East Lothian. Pinkie is believed to be the largest single battle ever fought in Scotland in terms of the numbers of combatants involved.
Further details can be accessed on our Heritage Portal.
We received four responses. None of the responses called into question the importance of the battlefield. They raised points in relation to the detail of the record, covering aspects such as the events of the battle, surviving features in the landscape, documentary evidence, and use of maps to illustrate the battle.
After considering the comments received during the consultation, we have made updates to the inventory record.
We also undertook further research to take account of feedback. On the basis of this work, we consider that the existing inventory area of interest defined by the boundary does not include sufficient land at the top of Falside Hill to account for one of the possible locations of the English army. To remedy this, we are proposing a revision to the south-eastern boundary.
We are organising a second consultation to provide opportunities for stakeholders who may be affected to comment on this proposed change.
Download the Report of Handling and comment on the second consultation from our Heritage Portal.